A Game of Chess: Difference between revisions

Undoing vandalism
imported>GodzillaFan1
mNo edit summary
imported>Mai sentry
(Undoing vandalism)
Line 3:
When I was a little boy, about the age of 5, my grandparents told me a story that I loved. It was called, "A Game of Chess." I wanted to tell me it all the time, and I thought you'd be interested.
 
Apparently, my grandparentsgranparents had made it up because when I looked it up, there were no results. That is why I decided to tell you about A Game of Chess.
 
Here it is, but the way my grandparents told me it.
==The Story==
In Western times- the way the outlaws settled things was a simple game of chess. Whoever lost was shot in the head, and their body was dissimbereddisimbered - and buriedburried outside the courtyard.
 
That was when, Pete Wester - a dastardly outlaw came into the small town. He played the sheriff in a game of chess. They had agreed that whoever lost had to hand over the town, and whoever won kept his town. They started playing, and the outlaw made a great move.
Line 15:
The point of the story is that do not accept any challenge. That's what I think. The reason is because, the sheriff was foolish enough to accept the challenge.
 
What I do not like about the story is that the good guy lost, and I think that teaches something else. Something way, way more graphic then is ment to be thought. Surely, when I asked my grandparentsgranparents what the moral of the story was, my grandpa said:
 
"Well, t-the point of that story is to not be so foolish. If you are, then you'll accept any challenge. The scary part is that this happened when I was a kid, and that sheriff... he was my dad,"
Anonymous user