Trollpasta Wiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Mai sentry: Difference between revisions
imported>SchutzCrisp mNo edit summary |
imported>ALinkToThePasta No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
. |
. |
||
{{Template:SchutzCrisp Sig}} |
{{Template:SchutzCrisp Sig}} |
||
* {{OPPOSE}} Why would you revive this after 2 months? '''''[[User:ALinkToThePasta|ALinkToThePasta]] ([[User talk:ALinkToThePasta|talk]]) 21:48, April 22, 2018 (UTC)''''' |
|||
Revision as of 21:48, 22 April 2018
Well I guess it's that time again. Due to LOLSKELETONS' recent permanent departure and the fact that Dronian will never look at this wiki again for as long as he lives, Trollpasta is very much understaffed. Because of this, I believe that I am the best choice for the next bureaucrat. I'm the most active admin and one of, if not the, oldest active user here. I've made thousands of edits, deletions, and bans that have helped keep Trollpasta clean and I am actively involved in the greater community. I have a perfect record, not a single ban ever, which shows that I am trustworthy and reliable. With this, I hope to keep Trollpasta active and free for years to come.
SUPPORT - i'd say why you deserve bcrat but you pretty much just said it yourself potato, potato, ching chong tomato (talk) 01:25, February 8, 2018 (UTC)
SUPPORT - I agree with the above. User:PrinceCreeper
SUPPORT - just don’t set the whole place on fire. —Cytheiod (talk) 19:14, February 14, 2018 (UTC)
SUPPORT - I believe you'll do good for the wiki as you're the most active out of all 5 of us admins/crats, you an also do a bit more with these rights and I hope you'll use them carefully if you do receive them. ALinkToThePasta (talk) 19:18, February 14, 2018 (UTC)
OPPOSE - There's really nothing you need to do that you can't already do as an admin, and the wiki's been doing fine with just SG as a bureaucrat for over a year now. None of the reasons you've given in this application really apply to the bureaucrat right, as you can still do all of this with just admin rights, and promoting you even more wouldn't really help the understaffing problem. Instead of promoting already existing admins even further encouraging more people to get into editing/moderating would probably be a much better way to help the understaffing problem. If SG was planning on leaving any time soon or if you reply with an actual use you'd have for these rights I'd change to a support, but for now I'm opposing. --SARDONYXXX 13:45, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
OPPOSE - You're a decent admin, but I don't see why you need Bureaucrat rights
OPPOSE - Why would you revive this after 2 months? ALinkToThePasta (talk) 21:48, April 22, 2018 (UTC)
