Trollpasta Wiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Mai sentry: Difference between revisions
Trollpasta Wiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Mai sentry (view source)
Revision as of 12:03, 11 March 2022
, 2 years agono edit summary
imported>SARDONYXXX No edit summary |
Thermometer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
{{Request/Vote}}
{{SUPPORT}} i'd say why you deserve bcrat but you pretty much just said it yourself [[User:RookieKnight|potato, potato, ching chong tomato]] ([[User talk:RookieKnight|talk]]) 01:25, February 8, 2018 (UTC)
Line 13 ⟶ 11:
{{SUPPORT}} I believe you'll do good for the wiki as you're the most active out of all 5 of us admins/crats, you an also do a bit more with these rights and I hope you'll use them carefully if you do receive them. '''''[[User:ALinkToThePasta|ALinkToThePasta]] ([[User talk:ALinkToThePasta|talk]]) 19:18, February 14, 2018 (UTC)'''''
{{OPPOSE}} There's really nothing you need to do that you can't already do as an admin, and the wiki's been doing fine with just SG as a bureaucrat for over a year now. None of the reasons you've given in this application really apply to the bureaucrat right, as you can still do all of this with just admin rights, and promoting you even more wouldn't really help the understaffing problem. Instead of promoting already existing admins even further encouraging more people to get into editing/moderating would probably be a much better way to help the understaffing problem. If SG was planning on leaving any time soon or if you reply with an actual use you'd have for these rights I'd change to a support, but for now I'm opposing. --[[User:SARDONYXXX|SARDONYXXX]] 13:45, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
{{OPPOSE}} You're a decent admin, but I don't see why you need Bureaucrat rights
{{Template:SchutzCrisp Sig}}
: {{OPPOSE}} Why would you revive this after 2 months? '''''[[User:ALinkToThePasta|ALinkToThePasta]] ([[User talk:ALinkToThePasta|talk]]) 21:48, April 22, 2018 (UTC)'''''
| |||