American President Theory: Difference between revisions
m
→top: replaced: … → ... (2)
(Created page with "{{Note credit|This is a fictional joke story written by DaveTheUseless}} Do you ever wonder why some really questionable people run for President, while some more obviously qualified potential candidates don't? This particular election cycle, 17 Republicans ran, along with several Democrats. Concerning those Dems in particular: only 3 had any name recognition at all, and only 2 of them managed to win a state or more. There are two particular possibilities for this. One...") |
m (→top: replaced: … → ... (2)) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13:
I'll provide you with my answer, but first, I'll ask another question: who is Martin O'Malley?
He was the Mayor of Baltimore. Governor of Maryland. In-charge of the Democratic Governors Association. All of this gave him a minor sense of name recognition, but there was still a mystique about him that prevented him from ever pulling more than a percent or two in any state. How could this be possible for a politician who goes on late night television, plays the electric guitar, and has beach photos disseminated of his muscle-bound physique? Certainly, someone like him should have won more votes against a candidate with unfavorables as high as Clinton's, and against another candidate who, love him or not, was socialistic and therefore would be heavily embraced by some voters while just as forcibly opposed by others. Clearly, there's something wrong with this picture. How was
Some might point out that there was civil unrest in Maryland, but this occurred after O'Malley was Governor. Others might mention that O'Malley raised taxes while he was the Mayor of Baltimore, but it isn't unusual for mayors of major cities to raise taxes--in fact, it is often more likely that they will raise taxes than cut them. Finally, someone might mention that O'Malley was once close to the Clintons, but so is Republican candidate Donald Trump, who has been a vocal supporter of the Clinton family's political ambitions in the past. Thus, all three reasons why O'Malley didn't catch on are immediately dismissible.
Line 19:
With all that said, every great puzzle holds an answer somewhere. Whether we're solving a dollar store jigsaw or trying to reconcile quantum mechanics with general relativity, there ''always'' is a solution. If there wasn't one, then there wouldn't be a problem to begin with: such is law of the universe, and therefore, one that directly applies to United States politics.
You
So, how do we end up with the Richard Nixons and Donald Trumps of this world? How do we reach the abysmal lows of the Monica Lewinsky affair, Watergate, and the Iraq War?
Shall we play a game? It seems so, but only because we
''Now'' do you see?
|