Damn Daniel: Difference between revisions

m
→‎top: replaced: “ → ", ” → ", ’ → ' (31), ‘ → ' (2)
(Created page with "{{Note credit|This is a fictional joke story written by DaveTheUseless. Don't take it seriously, fellas.}} Listen: I know what you’re thinking. Right now. You’re thinking that the Internet is a rather splendorous place. Full of cat videos, people who rant and ramble on about their opinions and personal interests, and funny little pictures that we like to refer to as memes. Oh, hey, it’s a frog on a unicycle riding in and saying ‘O shit, here comes dat boi’. Or...")
 
m (→‎top: replaced: “ → ", ” → ", ’ → ' (31), ‘ → ' (2))
Line 1:
{{Note credit|This is a fictional joke story written by DaveTheUseless. Don't take it seriously, fellas.}}
 
Listen: I know what you’reyou're thinking. Right now. You’reYou're
thinking that the Internet is a rather splendorous place. Full of cat videos,
people who rant and ramble on about their opinions and personal interests, and
funny little pictures that we like to refer to as memes. Oh, hey, it’sit's a frog
on a unicycle riding in and saying ‘O'O shit, here comes dat boi’boi'. Or, oh, maybe I’mI'm
from the 1990s, and it’sit's ‘All'All your base are belong to us’us'. Perhaps it’sit's a very
recent picture, of Shrek fading off into disintegrating polygons, with a caption
of “I"I don’tdon't feel so good”good". Well, this all may be quite fun to you, especially
given the sense of empowerment that Internet anonymity provides you with, but
let me tell you--there’sthere's much more to life than that.
 
Much, much more.
 
Let’sLet's start off with an ancient adage, rather than a modern
day meme: what goes around comes around. This might seem like an unconvincing threat
from a spurned victim, but it really is much more than that. It’sIt's significantly
so, in actuality. Take it as an old wives’wives' tale at your own risk.
 
Consider this: damning someone is a potentially serious act.
When you damn someone, you are sending them straight to hell--assuming that
your act of damning is actually a potent one. (More on that later.) Imagine if what
you said did indeed come true: you’dyou'd be sending a whole lot of people to an
untimely demise and eternal torment, now wouldn’twouldn't you? Is that something that
you ''really'' want to be responsible for?
No: of course not. Unless you’reyou're a psychopath, or a sociopath.
 
But it’sit's just a figure of speech… right?
 
Now, listen here. I had a friend who was a pretty good guy.
I dug his shoes, too. We used to hang out all the time. But one day, I said something,
and I am presently being held accountable for it. If I could take it all back,
I would. But it’sit's too late. And I’mI'm not saying that ''only'' one of us is taking the heat for it. Maybe it’sit's the both of us.
That’sThat's the ''true'' peril of passing it
on. Maybe every time that you say it and mean it—because what really pollutes
is what comes from the mouth, as it extends directly from the heart—it’sheart—it's a
reflection of your very own corruption. And perhaps, even if you catch it in time
and don’tdon't actually say it, it’sit's already too late, because the corruption is already
inside of you. Whether it had spread to others would therefore be an entirely
different matter.
 
Now, let’slet's assume that the act of expressing damnation is
important in ways other than the act of saying. Consider typing, or sending a
stream of visual data onward from one website to another, having the same, or
Line 48:
all else… damning. In an exponential fashion.
 
I’mI'm going to assume that you’veyou've heard of collective
consciousness. It’sIt's the idea that one’sone's own ego is a delusion, and that agency
and internal locus of control are--to a significant degree--shams. This means
that what is inside is already outside, and what is external is already inner.
Given that thoughts arise from external stimuli without intrinsic intent, this
makes one’sone's own mind—well, you get what I’mI'm saying.
 
Like it or not, even if your intention does not always come true,