Trollpasta Wiki:Requests for adminship/SARDONYXXX

From Trollpasta Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

PREREQUISITE: AVAST

I am currently an AVAST.

Must have been active on the wiki for 5 months.

Since I left in late 2013, I have been back for 5 months.

Must have at least 750 good edits.

I have 4250 edits as of writing this, most of those edits are category/template related, quite a few of them are from sorting out/removing categories, as shown here.

Must know how to delete pages and files.

As an AVAST, I have already deleted several pages and files.

Must know how to block a user for an appropriate amount of time.

As an AVAST, I have already blocked several users for reasonable amounts of time for what they've done wrong.

Must be familiar with the layout of the wiki.

I am an active editor on the wiki every day, and have memorised the wiki's layout.

At the moment, I am one of the two most active editors on the wiki, and it will stay like that for a while. There are times when I am on the chat when there are no moderators or admins on, so chat powers would be helpful in times like that, and the ability to assign temps would be very helpful, since I am a long-time member of the chat community, so I know who is trustworthy and who is not. I have also never broken the rules, except 1 time, which was debatable, and the block was removed after a day. (This applies to both the chat and site), I also know the rules very well, as I have enforced them in the past. Aside from a few minor spats with a certain other user, my behaviour on the chat has been good, too.

Please consider my application, and give valid reasons for opposes, so I can work on anything bad about myself thank you.

SARDONYXXX Template:Request/Vote

SUPPORT - I think you would be alright for admin, since you're always editing things, you're also on chat a lot, so over all you're a pretty active user, also two admins have left I believe, so you would be a perfect replacement for them. - FriedTunaWaffles

SUPPORT - High-quality editor, consistent, high edit count and active. Perfect choice for admin. --Skepolo 09:24, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT - While I don't really see you fit for admin, I trust you'll solve the lack of chat moderators problem. - CRover

NEUTRAL - You meet the requirements and you having the rights would be useful, but you tend to cause drama and I can't help but feel you'll abuse the rights one way or another. — Wolfbearr (talk | contribs) 09:30, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

  • I would never abuse, it would be a waste of the time I have put into this wiki, and ruin my history of no bans SARDONYXXX 09:44, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT - yes - Handsome Jerk

SUPPORT - Ok - Mai sentry 13:53, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT - He has swag. ~~Wikiman7

SUPPORT - --Hm0's (talk) 15:09, August 9, 2015 (UTC)\

SUPPORT - Didn't you say something about not qualifying last week when I asked if you were gonna apply since goddy stepped down? Anyways, looks like you'll do fine. (insert edgy rap lyrics here) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2xnitro (talkcontribs)

OPPOSE - Sorry but I know that if you did become admin we would all be banned...First of all you always act butthurt when someone dislikes you...second of all you always say that you are perfect even tho every one is not perfect...third and last of all...DRAMA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LordLM (talkcontribs)

  • I can already ban people, but I wouldn't abuse power, and there is no evidence that I would, as previously stated, another thing, I do not take insults on the internet seriously, that is not "butthurt", and the people who it is with know it, it is only you who thinks the "perfect" thing is serious, too. You have no evidence to base the "ban everyone" claim on, and the rest of your oppose is basically just jokes you take seriously, when others do not SARDONYXXX 18:55, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT - meh —Preceding unsigned comment added by D Wulf (talkcontribs)

SUPPORT - Ok, you're a good editor, I don't see why not. Meunstr (talk) 22:22, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT - I've seen you on chat at times when nobody else was, and we do need that.-A Rather hilarious Bone Structure

SUPPORT - She's active, appears to be competent for the job and this site really needs active admins to bring down the huge amount of unfunny pastas here. A never-ending chain of events intertwined by sentences... A picture is worth a thousand words, but only a thousand words will be a story. (talk) 19:30, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT -Sardinexxx is literally one of the best people who could be qualified for admin, we've become fast friends and literally, one of the best editors on here. - XXProValenciaXx (talk) 06:20, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT - - For the full week I'm here Trash Boat seemed like an okay person that can fit an admin status, I Respect this suer and see Trash boat being a pretty good admin. ALinkToThePasta (talk) 10:04, August 18, 2015 (UTC)

SUPPORT - - Cuz you seem to be a nice guy and i trust ya. --DrakeDDuxon (talk) 10:57, August 18, 2015 (UTC)