Trollpasta Wiki:Requests for rollback/FriedTunaWaffles: Difference between revisions
imported>2xninto No edit summary |
Thermometer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(22 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi, I'm FriedTunaWaffles, I have been helping this wiki for quite a while now and some people have suggested that I should apply for rollback, so here. |
{{Closed app|Not passed.|sig = [[User:Skepolo|Skepolo]]}}Hi, I'm FriedTunaWaffles, I have been helping this wiki for quite a while now and some people have suggested that I should apply for rollback, so here. |
||
==Requirements== |
==Requirements== |
||
*I've had an account since July 4th, 2014 and have been regularly coming here since. |
*I've had an account since July 4th, 2014 and have been regularly coming here since. |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:FriedTunaWaffles|FriedTunaWaffles]] ([[User talk:FriedTunaWaffles|talk]]) 04:28, December 8, 2015 (UTC) |
[[User:FriedTunaWaffles|FriedTunaWaffles]] ([[User talk:FriedTunaWaffles|talk]]) 04:28, December 8, 2015 (UTC) |
||
'''DEADLINE: DECEMBER 15TH''' |
|||
{{Request/Vote}} |
{{Request/Vote}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | {{SUPPORT}} yes please --<div style="border: solid 3px black; background-color:black;##CCCCFF;color: nowrap; display: inline; {{SUBST:border-recangle|1em}};"> |
||
{{SUPPORT}} sounds good -- SneakSnake 04:52, December 8, 2015 (UTC |
{{SUPPORT}} sounds good -- SneakSnake 04:52, December 8, 2015 (UTC |
||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
{{SUPPORT}} k -RadarMatt |
{{SUPPORT}} k -RadarMatt |
||
<s>{{Support}} Power hunger {{user:2xnitro/sig}}</s><blockquote>{{Oppose}} I'll be honest with you, You are inactive on main, being active on chat doesn't mean anything for a right on the main site. {{user:2xnitro/sig}} </blockquote> |
|||
{{Support}} Power hunger {{user:2xnitro/sig}} |
|||
{{Oppose}} Actually, come to think of it, I don't see much activity of you being on the main site. Sure you are on chat, but that doesn't mean that you are active on the main. - Ryujo111 |
|||
{{oppose}} you're less active than skepolo and mai. also, being active on chat =/= contributing to the site [[User:SOMEGUY123|SOMEGUY123]] ([[User talk:SOMEGUY123|talk]]) 18:20, December 8, 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{neutral}} After stalking your edits per activity, it seems like it's not something to have a 100% guarantee that you'll do a good use of the rights. But eh, I suppose I saw worse on other wikis. [[User:Bliming Redshire|Bliming Redshire]] ([[User talk:Bliming Redshire|talk]]) 19:18, December 8, 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{OPPOSE}} Don't think you'll really use the rights, you're also not very active |
|||
[[User:SARDONYXXX|SARDONYXXX]] |
|||
{{oppose}} you're not active on the main site Tuna, being active on chat doesn't say anything when you want to be rollback, when speaking on chat you're fine but on the main site you're less active than Ginny or Mai or fuckin' Carc. '''''[[User:ALinkToThePasta|ALinkToThePasta]] ([[User talk:ALinkToThePasta|talk]]) 20:43, December 8, 2015 (UTC)''''' |
|||
{{SUPPORT}}<nowiki> I don't see why there is so much tension over getting rollback. You can't really do that much with it. But you meet the requirements, so yeah. Of course. -Velvet VASE, DUH</nowiki> |
|||
{{Oppose}}You go on chat? Rollback has nothing to do with the chat you're also not very active {{User:Thuggle/Signature}} |
|||
{{Oppose}}You have done a ''few'' good edits, but being active on chat is '''not''' a reason to be a rollback. Be more active on the main site. --[[User:Skepolo|Skepolo]] 23:09, December 9, 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{OPPOSE}} no - enemy |
Latest revision as of 13:58, 11 March 2022
Closed application |
---|
Consensus: Not passed. Skepolo Hi, I'm FriedTunaWaffles, I have been helping this wiki for quite a while now and some people have suggested that I should apply for rollback, so here. Requirements
Reasons why I want RollbackI want Rollback because as of right now, I don't think there are any other Rollbacks, and I can undo bad edits done by users (i.e vandalism). I'm sure I can be trusted as a Rollback as I have never had a serious ban before, and again, I am pretty active on the site, giving me the position would give me motivation to be more active. And that's it, really. FriedTunaWaffles (talk) 04:28, December 8, 2015 (UTC) DEADLINE: DECEMBER 15TH SUPPORT - yes please -- 04:35, December 8, 2015 (UTC)SUPPORT - sounds good -- SneakSnake 04:52, December 8, 2015 (UTC
OPPOSE - Actually, come to think of it, I don't see much activity of you being on the main site. Sure you are on chat, but that doesn't mean that you are active on the main. - Ryujo111 OPPOSE - you're less active than skepolo and mai. also, being active on chat =/= contributing to the site SOMEGUY123 (talk) 18:20, December 8, 2015 (UTC) NEUTRAL - After stalking your edits per activity, it seems like it's not something to have a 100% guarantee that you'll do a good use of the rights. But eh, I suppose I saw worse on other wikis. Bliming Redshire (talk) 19:18, December 8, 2015 (UTC) OPPOSE - Don't think you'll really use the rights, you're also not very active OPPOSE - you're not active on the main site Tuna, being active on chat doesn't say anything when you want to be rollback, when speaking on chat you're fine but on the main site you're less active than Ginny or Mai or fuckin' Carc. ALinkToThePasta (talk) 20:43, December 8, 2015 (UTC) SUPPORT - I don't see why there is so much tension over getting rollback. You can't really do that much with it. But you meet the requirements, so yeah. Of course. -Velvet VASE, DUH OPPOSE -You go on chat? Rollback has nothing to do with the chat you're also not very active Thuggle OPPOSE -You have done a few good edits, but being active on chat is not a reason to be a rollback. Be more active on the main site. --Skepolo 23:09, December 9, 2015 (UTC) |